Sweeteners/Industrial bulk

High-Fructose Corn Syrup

Also known as: HFCS-55, HFCS-42, Glucose-fructose syrup, Isoglucose

AvoidIndustrial bulk

Enzymatically isomerised corn syrup. Cheaper than sucrose and the dominant added sugar in US processed food.

22
SweetSpot score
Sweetness vs sugar
1×
Glycemic index
73
high
Calories
4 kcal/g
Verdict
Avoid

At a glance

5 of 10 metrics graded

How High-Fructose Corn Syrup compares to table sugar on the three numbers most people actually want.

Sweetness vs sugar
1×
vs sugar 1×
Same as sugar
Glycemic index
73
vs sugar 65
At or above sucrose
Calories per gram
4 kcal
vs sugar 4 kcal
Same as sugar
SweetSpot score
22/100
AvoidPoorModerateGoodExcellent

Ten-metric breakdown

See methodology →
  • Taste quality
    Weight 20%
    90
  • Glycemic impact
    Weight 18%
    15
  • Naturalness
    Weight 10%
    Pending
  • Tooth friendliness
    Weight 8%
    10
  • Overall safety
    Weight 14%
    Pending
  • Digestive comfort
    Weight 8%
    70
  • Gut microbiome
    Weight 8%
    Pending
  • Aftertaste
    Weight 6%
    Pending
  • Sustainability
    Weight 4%
    Pending
  • Allergen safety
    Weight 4%
    85

Source: public.sweeteners snapshot, refreshed 2026-04-27. "Pending" cells are catalogued but not yet graded by SweetSpot research.

What it actually is

HFCS is corn starch hydrolysed to glucose, then enzymatically isomerised to a glucose/fructose mix — typically 55% fructose for soft drinks (HFCS-55) or 42% for baked goods (HFCS-42). Total sweetness is roughly equal to sucrose.

The metabolic critique focuses on dose and form, not exotic chemistry: HFCS is a cheap free-sugar source that enabled enormous added-sugar increases in US processed food from 1980 onward. Per-calorie, HFCS-55 is fairly close to sucrose; per-real-world-exposure, it is much worse because it is everywhere.

The high fructose load is associated with NAFLD, hyperuricaemia, insulin resistance and — by way of soft-drink consumption — obesity. EU regulations cap isoglucose production, which is one reason European products often use sucrose where US products use HFCS.

What it does well
  • Cheap, easy to dose in liquid form
  • Stable, pumpable, long shelf life
Where it falls short
  • High fructose burden on the liver
  • Ubiquitous in US processed food — drives total added-sugar exposure
  • Strong association with NAFLD and metabolic syndrome at population level

Regulatory status

FDA (United States)
GRAS
EFSA (Europe)
Authorised (called isoglucose / glucose-fructose syrup in EU)
Acceptable daily intake
Within WHO free-sugar limits — but typical US exposure exceeds these by a wide margin

In practice

Best for
  • Industrial use only; almost never a deliberate consumer choice
Avoid if
  • Most people, most of the time
Where you'll find it

Mainstream sodas, condiments, breakfast cereals, bread